﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>《Live Mesh for Mac 修复与 Snow Leopard 不兼容问题》的评论</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live</link>
	<description>LiveSide 中文版，关注 Windows Live, MSN 及微软等相关的产品、技术和文化</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:51:31 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>作者：Picturepan2</title>
		<link>http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22858</link>
		<dc:creator>Picturepan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22858</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22856&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@软言软语&lt;/a&gt;, 正如您所说的，毕竟 Snow Leopard 和 Leopard 差别很大，请问 微软又是如何保证重写前与重写后的代码性能一样？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22856" rel="nofollow">@软言软语</a>, 正如您所说的，毕竟 Snow Leopard 和 Leopard 差别很大，请问 微软又是如何保证重写前与重写后的代码性能一样？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>作者：软言软语</title>
		<link>http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22856</link>
		<dc:creator>软言软语</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22856</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22835&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Picturepan2&lt;/a&gt;, 重写代码是为了兼容Snow Leopard，而不是为了增强在Leopard上的稳定性和性能，毕竟Snow Leopard与Leopard差别很大。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22835" rel="nofollow">@Picturepan2</a>, 重写代码是为了兼容Snow Leopard，而不是为了增强在Leopard上的稳定性和性能，毕竟Snow Leopard与Leopard差别很大。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>作者：Picturepan2</title>
		<link>http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22835</link>
		<dc:creator>Picturepan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22835</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-22833&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@软言软语&lt;/a&gt;, 额，重写代码也能保证性能一样？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-22833" rel="nofollow">@软言软语</a>, 额，重写代码也能保证性能一样？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>作者：软言软语</title>
		<link>http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22833</link>
		<dc:creator>软言软语</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livesino.net/archives/2303.live#comment-22833</guid>
		<description>应该没有稳定性及同步性能方面的增强，官方Blog上写了“Leopard users are not required to install this release.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>应该没有稳定性及同步性能方面的增强，官方Blog上写了“Leopard users are not required to install this release.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 213/217 objects using apc

Served from: livesino.net @ 2012-02-13 01:03:26 -->
